He could see, in Gödelian
terms, how money was just an abstract model of our value reality and, to
paraphrase Nadeau and Kafatos, that there would never be a one-to-one
correspondance between money-as-value theory and our value reality. In other
words: the conflict that we feel
by using money as we do exists as psychological reality due to the
unprovability and incompleteness of money as a model of value.
No comments:
Post a Comment